about

Do we shine a light into the dark ages…

vibrantly colored mosaic on the ceiling of a church. golden cross and stars.

…or does it illuminate what we know of ourselves? Gabriele and Perry’s ‘Bright Ages’. We might see a time that isn’t “isolated, savage, primitive,” but “messy and human.” Studying medieval Europe can teach us more about ourselves.

‘Do I want it? Life, that is.’

detail from the cover of On Not Knowing, abstract shapes the color of clouds

‘On Not Knowing‘ by Emily Ogden. What is there to hope for? Should we hope? We can work in the field, making bales of hay, but the work of the soul “never will be cut and dried.”

Two things ‘cancel culture’ refers to

two hands almost touching against a sky backdrop with glowing sun between their fingers

On ‘speaking first’ and the meaning of ‘engagement’. You can decline to “engage” online. Think quietly somewhere else. That’s not “cancel culture.” Rewarding someone for being wrong serves no one’s interests.

Quit Twitter?

Swampy forest with little fires everywhere

It’s been a Fire Swamp, and it’ll get worse. Here’s where you can go. If it isn’t Trump who’s given free rein to make Twitter swampier than it already is, it’ll be someone like Trump. Maybe a hundred Trump figures.

We may not have Twitter tomorrow

Letting go is a complex process, and there’s no one right way to do it. Sometimes good things can’t be saved. We can be sad and frustrated. But, even not wanting to let go, we can give ourselves permission to actually let go.

If you’re told your position is harmful

A car is crossing the trolley tracks in a city, perpendicular to all other traffic. Nearby, pedestrians are standing.

Someone’s mad at your car. Did you almost run them over? I can pause and apologize. I care about others. I recognize that their perspectives are valid and their observations about my behavior might be correct.

I just want to select NO

hands touching a blank touchscreen

The worst YES/NO interface design I’ve seen. We can create a nonviolent culture with the first questions we ask, being willing to hear an answer that’s polarized or ambivalent, loud or quiet.

We are the book we’re talking about

illustration of long-haired teen on a blue background holding a yellow flower

And we are what’s at stake in truth-telling. If the interlocutor opposes me because of who I am, will they be impressed that I read a book? No. Even if it is a book they have heard of? No.

It’s not ‘free speech,’ it’s bigotry

half of someone's face showing one eye with purple eye shadow

If they really believe in free speech, this is how we’ll know. There are many reasons why people have prejudices and why they devote their speech to expressing bigotry. Not high on the list: commitment to free speech.